International Journal of Head and Neck Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2021 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Use of Fenestrated Tracheostomy Tubes: A Comparative Study

Somu Lakshmanan, Shiva Priya Jeyabalakrishnan, Prasanna K Saravanam

Keywords : Fol, Granulation, Stomal granulation, Tracheostomy tubes,Fenestrated

Citation Information : Lakshmanan S, Jeyabalakrishnan SP, Saravanam PK. Use of Fenestrated Tracheostomy Tubes: A Comparative Study. Int J Head Neck Surg 2021; 12 (1):15-18.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10001-1419

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 31-03-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction: Tracheostomy is commonly performed in patients requiring long-term ventilator support. There are many types of tracheostomy tubes like fenestrated and non-fenestrated tubes. This study is to compare the types of fenestrated tubes. Type I is a fenestrated tube with multiple small fenestrae and type II is a fenestrated tracheostomy tube with a single large fenestra. Materials and methods: A total of 87 patients who underwent tracheostomy due to prolonged ventilation from January 2015 to January 2016 were included in the study. Type I tube was used in 40 patients and type II tube was used in 47 patients. Tube change was done on the 10th day, at the end of 1 month, and at the end of 3 months. Flexible laryngoscopy is done during every tube change to assess the airway. Results: Two groups were compared in terms of granulation through fenestra, stomal granulation, frequency of suctioning, and inner tube block. Statistical analysis was done and the values were compared. A p value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. There was a statistically significant difference between both groups in terms of less incidence of granulation through the fenestra and stomal granulation in type II tube. Conclusion: Type II tubes are more patient compliant. The incidence of inner tube block is comparatively less which makes it safe to use and avoid life-threatening situations. Decannulation can be done earlier and without complications in patients with type II tubes due to the less incidence of stomal granulation. Thus, type II tube is safer to use and has minimal complications.


PDF Share
  1. Cox CE, Carson SS, Holmes GM, et al. Increase in tracheostomy for prolonged mechanical ventilation in North Carolina, 1993-2002. Crit Care Med 2004;32(11):2219–2226. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000145232.46143.40.
  2. Yaremchuk K. Regular tracheostomy tube changes to prevent formation of granulation tissue. Laryngoscope 2003;113(1):1–10. DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200301000-00001.
  3. Plummer AL, Gracey DR. Consensus conference on artificial airways in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Chest 1989;96(1):178–180. DOI: 10.1378/chest.96.1.178.
  4. White AC, Kher S, O'Connor HH. Respiratory care. When to Change a Tracheostomy Tube 2010;55(8):1069–1075.
  5. Eisele RF. “Fenestrated tracheostomy tube.” U.S. Patent No. 4,852,565. 1 Aug. 1989.
  6. Siddharth P, Mazzarella L. Granuloma associated with fenestrated tracheostomy tubes. Am J Surg 150(2):279–280. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(85)90138-2.
  7. Bhatia G, Abraham V, Louis L. Tracheal granulation as a cause of unrecognized airway narrowing. J Anaesthesiol, Clin Pharmacol 2012;28(2):235–238. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.94907.
  8. Griggs A. Tracheostomy: suctioning and humidification. Emerg Nurse 1999;6(9):33–38. DOI: 10.7748/en1999.02.6.9.33.c1259.
  9. McGrath BA, Bates L, Atkinson D, et al. Multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of tracheostomy and laryngectomy airway emergencies. Anaesthesia 2012;67(9):1025–1041. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07217.x.
  10. Ng J, Hamrang-Yousefi S, Agarwal A. Tracheostomy tube change. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.