International Journal of Head and Neck Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 4 ( October-December, 2015 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Reconstruction of Complex Buccolabial Defects: Feasibility of Local Flaps with respect to Cosmetic and Functional Outcomes

SR Priya, Chandrashekhar Dravid

Citation Information : Priya S, Dravid C. Reconstruction of Complex Buccolabial Defects: Feasibility of Local Flaps with respect to Cosmetic and Functional Outcomes. Int J Head Neck Surg 2015; 6 (4):155-160.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10001-1246

Published Online: 00-12-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Background

Complex defects resulting from resection of buccolabial cancers are generally reconstructed with pedicled flaps or with free flaps, often resulting in suboptimal cosmesis and function.

Materials and methods

A total of 11 patients with malignancies involving the oral commissure and lips were studied. Wide excision and reconstruction with local flaps was done. Posttreatment mouth opening, hair match, color match, vermilion match, resection margins, and disease control were documented.

Results

Average interlabial mouth opening was 3.6 cm and interincisor 3.3 cm. Good hair and color match was seen in all patients. Vermilion match was achieved in all but three patients. Resection margins were wide in all. All but one patient (distant metastases of malignant melanoma) were disease free at the last follow-up.

Conclusion

Local flaps provide good cover for complex buccolabial defects, without affecting disease clearance. In view of definite advantages over distant and free flaps, they should regain their place in the head and neck surgeon's armamentarium.

How to cite this article

Dravid C, Priya SR. Reconstruction of Complex Buccolabial Defects: Feasibility of Local Flaps with respect to Cosmetic and Functional Outcomes. Int J Head Neck Surg 2015;6(4):155-160.


PDF Share
  1. Reconstruction of the lips. Operative techniques in otolaryngology head neck surgery. 1993 Mar;4(1):46-53.
  2. Surgical repair of labial defect. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2010 May;127(2):49-62.
  3. A method of reconstructing loss of substance in one lip from the other lip. Plast Reconstr Surg 1968;42(4):360-364.
  4. ; Millard, DR. The principles and art of plastic surgery. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co; 1957. p. 497-519.
  5. Reconstruction of lip defects by local arterial flaps. Br J Plast Surg 1974 Jan;27(1):93-97.
  6. A contribution to the primary reconstruction of the upper lip and labial commissure following tumour excision. J Maxillofac Surg 1975 Dec;3(4):211-217.
  7. Reconstruction of the upper and lower lip using a modified Bernard-Burrow technique. Ann Plast Surg 1980 Aug;5(2):100.
  8. Functional lower lip reconstruction with bilateral cheek advancement flaps: revisitation of Webster method with a minor modification in the technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2002 Nov-Dec;26(6):423-428.
  9. Modified Bernard-Burrow cheek advancement and cross-lip flap for total lip reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996 Nov;122(11):1253-1258.
  10. “Gate flap” for the total reconstruction of the lower lip. Br J Plast Surg 1980 Jul;33(3):340-345.
  11. One-stage reconstruction of a large defect of the lower lip and oral commissure. Br J Plast Surg 2005 Jul;58(5):614-618.
  12. Experience with the deltopectoral flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1977 Mar;59(3):360-365.
  13. Regional flaps in facial reconstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1990 Oct;23(5):925-946.
  14. Correction of major facial defects by pedicled flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1963 May;31(5):407-423.
  15. Reconstruction of concomitant total loss of the upper and lower lips with a free vertical rectus abdominis flap. Microsurgery 2005 Jan;25(2):118-120.
  16. Reduction of donor site morbidity of free radial forearm flaps: what level of evidence is available? Eplasty 2012;12:e9.
  17. Multistaged reconstruction of the oral commissures and upper and lower lip with an island submental flap and a nasolabial flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001 Sep 15;108(4):968-971.
  18. Advanced squamous cell carcinoma involving both upper and lower lips and oral commissure with simultaneous reconstruction by local flap: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2012 Jan 18;6:23.
  19. Estlander flap combined with an extended upper lip flap technique for large defects of lower lip with oral commissure. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009 Aug;62(8):997-1003.
  20. Reconstruction of perioral defects following resection for oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006 Mar;64(3):367-374.
  21. Mouth opening, cheek flexibility and tongue protrusion parameters of 800 normal patients in Chennai, South India—a baseline study to enable assessment of alteration in oral submucous fibrosis. J Indian Dent Assoc 2001 Jan;72:78-80.
  22. Normal mouth opening in an adult Indian population. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2012 Sep; 11(3):309-313.
  23. Factors associated with restricted mouth opening and its relationship to health-related quality of life in patients attending a maxillofacial oncology clinic. Oral Oncol 2008 May;44(5):430-438.
  24. Functional reconstruction of complex lip and cheek defect with free composite anterolateral thigh flap and vascularized fascia. Head Neck 2008 Aug;30(8):1001-1006. doi 10.1002/hed August 2008.
  25. Functional lower lip reconstruction with a forearm flap combined with a free gracilis muscle transfer. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006 Aug;59(8):867-870.
  26. Facial reconstruction with local and distant tissue: the interface of aesthetic and reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998 Oct;102(5):1424-1433.
  27. Lower lip reconstruction after tumor resection; a single author's experience with various methods. J Egypt Natl Cancer Inst 2006 Dec;18(4):323-333.
  28. Prospective comparative study of lower lip defects reconstruction with different local flaps. J Craniofac Surg 2011 Nov;22(6):2255-2259.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.