International Journal of Head and Neck Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2024 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Utility of Navigation Technology in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Aswathi Paleri, Ravi Ramalingam, K K Ramalingam, Sanjay Udupi, Wasim Khan, Ramu Harirajan

Keywords : Chronic rhinosinusitis, Endoscopic sinus surgery, Sinus polyposis, Surgical navigation

Citation Information : Paleri A, Ramalingam R, Ramalingam KK, Udupi S, Khan W, Harirajan R. Utility of Navigation Technology in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. Int J Head Neck Surg 2024; 15 (1):8-13.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10001-1564

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 06-09-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Objectives: Navigation is a novel technique to aid the surgeon in difficult rhinologic surgeries, such as extensive sinonasal polyposis (SNP), revision surgeries, anatomical variants of the nose and paranasal sinuses, and cerebrospinal fluid leaks. The study aimed to determine the usage of the navigation system for surgeons in functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Materials and methods: In this study, 60 patients were recruited from KKR ENT Hospital and Research Institute, Chennai, and divided into groups A and B, who underwent FESS with and without image guidance, respectively. Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with sinonasal polyposis (SNP), undergoing revision surgery for recurrent SNP sinonasal tumors (SNT), and frontal sinus disease (FSD) were recruited. Lund-Mackay pre- and postoperative endoscopic scores and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) scores were analyzed. Computed tomography (CT) scans of the nose and paranasal sinuses were conducted. The patients were subjected to FESS, and following evaluation and affordability, navigation assistance (Fusion Compact Medtronic Navigation System) was used. During the follow-up period, nasal endoscopy was done and postoperative endoscopic scores were calculated along with the SNOT-22 scores. Results: The pre- and postoperative endoscopic and SNOT-22 values between groups A and B were not significantly different. Intraoperative complications were encountered only in group B, with more recurrences, suggesting a substantial advantage for patients in group A over group B. The correlation between the use of navigation and patient outcomes was significantly different (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Using the navigation system is an advantage for skilled surgeons to identify the boundaries of anatomical structures with greater accuracy and precision.


PDF Share
  1. Rosenfeld RM, Piccirillo JF, Chandrasekhar SS, et al. Clinical practice guidelines on adult sinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;137:375–377. DOI: 10.1177/0194599815572097
  2. Halawi AM, Smith SS, Chandra RK. Chronic rhinosinusitis: epidemiology and cost. Allergy Asthma Proc 2013;34:328–334. DOI: 10.2500/aap.2013.34.3675
  3. Soler ZM, Wittenberg E, Schlosser RJ, et al. Health state utility values in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 2011;121:2672–2678. DOI: 10.1002/lary.21847
  4. Rudmik L, Smith TL, Schlosser RJ, et al. Productivity costs in patients with refractory chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 2014;124:2007–2012. DOI: 10.1002/lary.24630
  5. Bhattacharyya N. Incremental health care utilization and expenditures for chronic rhinosinusitis in the United States. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2011;120:423. DOI: 10.1177/000348941112000701
  6. Surapaneni H, Sisodia SS. Aetiology, diagnosis and treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a study in a teaching hospital in Telangana. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;2:14–17. DOI: 10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20160062
  7. Karuthedath S, Singh I, Chadha S. Impact of functional endoscopic sinus surgery on the pulmonary function of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;66:44–48. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-014-0758-7
  8. Regi K, Elizabeth S, Vedantam R. Impact of functional endoscopic sinus surgery on patients with chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective, cohort study among Indian patients. Clin Rhinol Int J 2018;11:1–6. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10013-1333
  9. Meltzer EO, Hamilos DL, Hadley JA, et al. Rhinosinusitis: establishing definitions for clinical research and patient care. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;114:155–212. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.09.029
  10. Kaszuba SM, Steward MG. Medical management and diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis: a survey of treatment patterns by United States otolaryngologists. Am J Rhinol 2006;20:186–190. PMID: 16686386.
  11. Bhattacharyya N. Clinical outcomes after endoscopic sinus surgery. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2006;6:167–171. DOI: 10.1097/01.all.0000225154.45027.a4
  12. Stevens WW, Schleimer RP, Kern RC. Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2016;4:565–572. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.04.012
  13. Das S, Kirsch CFE. Imaging of lumps and bumps in the nose: a review of sinonasal tumours. Cancer Imaging 2005;5:167–177. DOI: 10.1102/1470-7330.2005.0111
  14. Lang EE, Curran AJ, Patil N, et al. Intracranial complications of acute frontal sinusitis. Clin Otolaryngol 2001;26:452–157. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2001.00499.x
  15. Lund V J, Rowe-Jones J. Surgical management of rhinosinusitis. Scott Brown, 7th edition. Great Britain: Hodder Arnold; 2008. pp. 1481–1482.
  16. Marple BF, Stankiewicz JA, Baroody FM, et al. Diagnosis and management of chronic rhinosinusitis in adults. Postgrad Med 2009;121:121–139. DOI: 10.3810/pgm.2009.11.2081
  17. Soteriou E, Grauvogel J, Laszig R, et al. Prospects and limitations of different registration modalities in electromagnetic ENT navigation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;273:3979–3986. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4063-9
  18. Kennedy DW, Shaman P, Han W, et al. Complications of ethmoidectomy: a survey of fellows of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Otolaryng Head Neck Surg 1994;111:589–599. DOI: 10.1177/019459989411100509
  19. Irugu DV, Stammberger HR. A note on the technical aspects and evaluation of the role of navigation system in endoscopic endonasal surgeries. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;66:307–313. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-011-0380-x
  20. Leonard S, Reiter A, Sinha A, et al. Image-based navigation for functional endoscopic sinus surgery using structure from motion. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 2016;9784:97840. DOI: 10.1117/12.2217279
  21. Strauss G, Limpert E, Strauss M, et al. Evaluation of a daily used navigation system for FESS. Laryngorhinootologie 2009;88:776781. DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1237352
  22. Fried MP, Parkh SR, Sodougui B. Image-guidance for endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 2008;118:1287–1292. DOI: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31816bce76
  23. Metson RB, Cosenza MJ, Cunningham MJ, et al. Physician experience with an optical image guidance system for sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 2000;110:972–976. DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200006000-00017
  24. Tschopp KP, Thomaser EG. Outcome of functional endonasal sinus surgery with and without CT-navigation. Rhinology 2008;46:116–120. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-966090
  25. Kennedy JL, Hubbard MA, Huyett P, et al. Sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT-22): a predictor of postsurgical improvement in patients with chronic sinusitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2013;111:246–251. DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2013.06.033
  26. Snidvongs K, Dalgorf D, Kalish L, et al. Modified Lund Mackay Postoperative Endoscopy Score for defining inflammatory burden in chronic rhinosinusitis. Rhinology 2014;52:53–59. DOI: 10.4193/Rhino13.056
  27. Samarakkody ZM, Abdullah B. The use of image guided navigational tracking systems for endoscopic sinus surgery and skull base surgery: a review. Egypt J Ear Nose Throat Allied Sci 2016;17:133–137. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejenta.2016.07.005
  28. Bagul M. CT study of paranasal sinus pathologies. Indian J Sci Res 2016;4:13. DOI: 10.17354/ijss/2016/364
  29. Hopkins C, Gillett S, Slack R, et al. Psychometric validity of the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test. Clin Otolaryngol 2009;34(5):447–454. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01995.x
  30. Fokkens W, Lund V, Hopkins C, et al. European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020. Rhinology 2020;20:1–464. DOI: 10.4193/Rhin20.600
  31. Lind H, Joergensen G, Lange B, et al. Efficacy of ESS in chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyposis: a Danish cohort study. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 2016;273:911–919. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3667-9
  32. Soler ZM, Jones R, Le P, et al. Sino-nasal outcome test-22 outcomes after sinus surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 2018;128:581–592. DOI: 10.1002/lary.27008
  33. Lund VJ, Mackay IS. Staging in rhinosinusitis. Rhinology 1993;31:183–184. DOI: 10.1016/S0194-5998(97)70005-6
  34. Al-Swaiahb JN, Al-Dousary SH. Computer-aided endoscopic sinus surgery: a retrospective comparative study. Ann Saudi Med 2010;30:149–152. DOI: 10.4103/0256-4947.60522
  35. Metson R, Gray ST. Image-guided sinus surgery: practical considerations. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2005;38:527–534. DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2004.11.002
  36. Olson G, Citardi MJ. Image-guided functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;123:188–194. DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2000.107453
  37. Fried MP, Moharir VM, Shin J, et al. Comparison of endoscopic sinus surgery with and without image guidance. Am J Rhinol 2002;16:193–197. DOI: 10.1177/194589240201600403
  38. Stelter K, Andratschke M, Leunig A, et al. Computer-assisted surgery of the paranasal sinuses: technical and clinical experience with 368 patients, using the Vector Vision Compact system. J Laryngol Otol 2006;120:1026–1032. DOI: 10.1017/S0022215106003197
  39. Farhadi M, Jalessi M, Sharifi G, et al. Use of image guidance in endoscopic endonasal surgeries: a 5-year experience. B-ENT 2011;7:277–282.
  40. Tabaee A, Kassenoff TL, Kacker A, et al. The efficacy of computer assisted surgery in the endoscopic management of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;133:936–943. DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.07.028
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.